Assignment 4: Field Research on Good Practices: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* Back to [[TELOS_Assignments_2022-2023|assignments overview]] | * Back to [[TELOS_Assignments_2022-2023|assignments overview]] | ||
* Back to [[TELOS_Online_Seminar_2022-2023| | * Back to [[TELOS_Online_Seminar_2022-2023|seminar overview]] | ||
--- | ---- | ||
[[File:Assignment4.png|300px|frameless|right]] | |||
This assignment is designed for those students who are not working on a local landscape context during the seminar period. We invite you to do desk research (i.e. use secondary data sources) to find out what others are already doing in the context of innovative landscape economy approaches and which good practices exist. | This assignment is designed for those students who are not working on a local landscape context during the seminar period. We invite you to do desk research (i.e. use secondary data sources) to find out what others are already doing in the context of innovative landscape economy approaches and which good practices exist. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
What all have in common are innovative value propositions that respond to social and environmental needs that are rooted in the landscape and mitigate/reduce negative impacts. | What all have in common are innovative value propositions that respond to social and environmental needs that are rooted in the landscape and mitigate/reduce negative impacts. | ||
You are asked to individually collect secondary data on an innovative landscape economy initiative and to summarise the information available by filling out the case study template | You are asked to individually collect secondary data on an innovative landscape economy initiative and to summarise the information available by filling out the [https://ilias.hfwu.de/goto.php?target=file_39991_download&client_id=hfwu case study template]. | ||
== Submission Time & Format == | == Submission Time & Format == | ||
Write a brief report (about 5 pages including images and reference, excluding cover page) in which you summarise the information of your local case. You may concentrate on specific aspects of the case study. Attach supplementary information (e.g., graphical material) if available. | Write a brief report (about 5 pages including images and reference, excluding cover page) in which you summarise the information of your local case. You may concentrate on specific aspects of the case study. Attach supplementary information (e.g., graphical material) if available. | ||
For structuring your paper, you may follow the content elements of the case study template. | For structuring your paper, you may follow the content elements of the [https://ilias.hfwu.de/goto.php?target=file_39991_download&client_id=hfwu case study template.] | ||
Make sure you include a personal reflective dimension; this is part of the evaluation. | Make sure you include a personal reflective dimension; this is part of the evaluation. | ||
* Present your findings in class on '''December 12, 2022.''' | * Present your findings in class on '''December 12, 2022.''' | ||
* Upload your report on the same day | * Upload your report on the same day [https://ilias.hfwu.de/goto.php?target=exc_39570&client_id=hfwu on ILIAS] | ||
If you take the 5 ECTS variant of the course, the combined evaluation of your report and the presentation will determine your seminar grade. In addition, assignment 1 needs to be done, but will not be graded. | If you take the 5 ECTS variant of the course, the combined evaluation of your report and the presentation will determine your seminar grade. In addition, assignment 1 needs to be done, but will not be graded. | ||
| Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
* Thoughtful response to questions during discussions | * Thoughtful response to questions during discussions | ||
* Good writing style, meeting academic standards | * Good writing style, meeting academic standards | ||
[[Category:TELOS Assignments]] | |||
Latest revision as of 16:30, 29 November 2022
- Back to assignments overview
- Back to seminar overview
This assignment is designed for those students who are not working on a local landscape context during the seminar period. We invite you to do desk research (i.e. use secondary data sources) to find out what others are already doing in the context of innovative landscape economy approaches and which good practices exist.
This research is guided by the following questions:
- What types of innovative approaches exist and how do they work?
- Which individuals are behind those initiatives and what motivates them?
- What could you learn from the case?
Innovation approaches are, for example: innovative forms of cooperation between public, private and social sectors, market-oriented approaches such as social businesses, alternative organisation models (i.e. cooperatives, benefit corporations, foundations) or innovative landscape governance approaches.
What all have in common are innovative value propositions that respond to social and environmental needs that are rooted in the landscape and mitigate/reduce negative impacts.
You are asked to individually collect secondary data on an innovative landscape economy initiative and to summarise the information available by filling out the case study template.
Submission Time & Format
Write a brief report (about 5 pages including images and reference, excluding cover page) in which you summarise the information of your local case. You may concentrate on specific aspects of the case study. Attach supplementary information (e.g., graphical material) if available.
For structuring your paper, you may follow the content elements of the case study template.
Make sure you include a personal reflective dimension; this is part of the evaluation.
- Present your findings in class on December 12, 2022.
- Upload your report on the same day on ILIAS
If you take the 5 ECTS variant of the course, the combined evaluation of your report and the presentation will determine your seminar grade. In addition, assignment 1 needs to be done, but will not be graded.
Evaluation criteria for assignment 4
- Correct and coherent translation of the good practice case into th social business model template
- Depth and quality of the personal reflection of the case
- Good time management and communication during team presentations
- Thoughtful response to questions during discussions
- Good writing style, meeting academic standards